On Wed, 2008-02-06 at 09:37 -0800, Luck, Tony wrote: > > Any reason the various ptrace bits are not included in this pull? > > The ptrace bits depend upon some generic changes to add arch_ptrace_stop() > ... I think Andrew included them as part 89/260 of today's early > morning mail patch bomb. Yes, exactly. I've been looking forward to it for some time already. Cheers, Petr Tesarik
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
|