Peter Chubb wrote: [Thu Dec 13 2007, 06:30:27PM EST] > Some comments: > -- `i.e.' should usually be followed by a comma. Read it as > `that is' and see if the resulting sentence makes sense > without a comma. Seems to be a matter of debate: http://dictionary.reference.com/help/faq/language/g58.html > -- Look for the PAL_CODE.... and map it using... > ^ > may be a nicer fix. I'll read it over. Your suggestion is probably best. > But it's mostly cosmetic anyway. Mostly? :-) I'll likely just leave out that change. The comma doesn't offend my sensibilties. I noticed it in passing and wasn't aware that "i.e." and "e.g." are sometimes followed by a comma. Thanks, Aron - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
|