RE: [IA64] Effective __clear_bit_unlock V2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [IA64] Effective __clear_bit_unlock V2
From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 13:27:18 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: linux-ia64@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Zoltan Menyhart <Zoltan.Menyhart@xxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <617E1C2C70743745A92448908E030B2A02CE2F71@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0710191050520.31589@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <617E1C2C70743745A92448908E030B2A02CE2F71@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Mon, 29 Oct 2007, Luck, Tony wrote:

> Is this the final take on this ...  or was there a newer better faster cleaner
> version?

AFAICT this is final.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [IA64] Effective __clear_bit_unlock V2
  - From: Zoltan Menyhart

References:
- [IA64] Effective __clear_bit_unlock V2
  - From: Christoph Lameter
- RE: [IA64] Effective __clear_bit_unlock V2
  - From: Luck, Tony

Prev by Date: RE: [IA64] Effective __clear_bit_unlock V2
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 3/9] ia64: VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING (accurate cpu time accounting)
Previous by thread: RE: [IA64] Effective __clear_bit_unlock V2
Next by thread: Re: [IA64] Effective __clear_bit_unlock V2
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Kernel] [Sparc Linux] [DCCP] [Linux ARM] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCSI] [Linux x86_64] [Linux for Ham Radio]

Powered by Linux