> Thanks. So Tony, how do think about the IA64 part of the patch? Having to use ia64_peek() and ia64_poke() to copy the RBS 8 bytes at a time looks a bit ugly ... but this isn't in the performance path (unless you are running your whole application under strace(1)!) so it probably isn't an issue. If it turns out to be, then an incremental fix on top of this would be the way to go. So I'm ok with the ia64 parts ... which leaves the open issue of the generic part (moving the spin_unlock_irq() after the set_current_state(TASK_TRACED)) ... which (if I follow this thread correctly) is still an open issue, right? -Tony - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
|