Re: [IA64] Reduce __clear_bit_unlock overhead

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 19 Oct 2007, Nick Piggin wrote:

> Of course, we can avoid the fence altogether on x86 as well, because
> it simply isn't needed for release semantics.

So we can generally switch to using wmb there?



__clear_bit_unlock: A write barrier is sufficient for release semantics

Switch the smb_mb that causes a fence instruction to be issued on x86
to a write barrier which issues no instruction on x86.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <clameter@xxxxxxx>

Index: linux-2.6/include/asm-generic/bitops/lock.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/include/asm-generic/bitops/lock.h	2007-10-19 04:08:58.000000000 -0700
+++ linux-2.6/include/asm-generic/bitops/lock.h	2007-10-19 04:09:17.000000000 -0700
@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ do {					\
  */
 #define __clear_bit_unlock(nr, addr)	\
 do {					\
-	smp_mb();			\
+	smp_wmb();			\
 	__clear_bit(nr, addr);		\
 } while (0)
 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Sparc Linux]     [DCCP]     [Linux ARM]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux x86_64]     [Linux for Ham Radio]

  Powered by Linux