On 5/17/07, Keith Owens <kaos@xxxxxxx> wrote:
David Mosberger reckons that unwind should never cause an error, maybe we should be looking at adding more checks to the unwind code to cope with spurious addresses?
That's correct. If the unwinder causes MCAs, it's broken. Robin, can you look into why the memory-access safety-checks in the unwinder aren't sufficient to avoid the MCAs you're seeing? --david -- Mosberger Consulting LLC, http://www.mosberger-consulting.com/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
![]() |