On Fri, 2007-04-27 at 12:11 -0400, Peter Keilty wrote: > > > No, but yes it can be done, overloading the meaning. > It would need to change in the future if vread was needed. > I have no strong argument against using it. > Although we may still need the IA64 define, I removed 32bit read mmio and > if that is brought back the fast syscall patch call will need to have a > field in the > clocksource struct that would indicated that. Waiting on comments about > that... > John and discuss this awhile back felt it was not needed, may prove wrong. The vread field is just a pointer, which should be 64bits on ia64. Why do you mention 32bits above? The two variables similar enough .. Daniel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
![]() |