On 19/03/07, Bernhard Walle <bwalle@xxxxxxx> wrote:
* Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@xxxxxxxxx> [2007-03-19 19:29]:
> >
> > -void
> > +int
> > register_percpu_irq (ia64_vector vec, struct irqaction *action)
> > {
>
> Each and every function example in Documentation/CodingStyle has the
> return type on the same line as the function name, so why not get
> these in-line while you are modifying them anyway?
Because all other functions in that file are coded this way. I think
it looks better if you don't change the style in a particular file.
Am I wrong?
Consistency within the file certainly makes sense. -- Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@xxxxxxxxx> Don't top-post http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html Plain text mails only, please http://www.expita.com/nomime.html - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
|