On 3/13/07, Jay Lan <jlan@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Magnus Damm wrote: > On 28 Feb 2007 07:38:55 +0800, Zou Nan hai <nanhai.zou@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> [excessive text deleted] >> So it is better to fix and clean up those issues. >> Calculate min_low_pfn and max_low_pfn in a consistent way. >> >> Below is the patch, please review and comments >> >> Signed-off-by: Zou Nan hai <nanhai.zou@xxxxxxxxx> > > I've seen similar problems on a HP rx2620 box using 2.6.20. I managed > to resolve that problem with a patch similar to this one, but then I > realized that the issue I was seeing had been solved already by some > mm-related patch by Bob Picco that got included in 2.6.21-rc1. I tested on 2.6.21-rc3 with DEBUG_VM turned on. The vanilla 2.6.21-rc3 without Nan-hai's patch, panicked on bugcheck on free_initmem->free_page as predicted. We still need this patch.
Ok, thanks for testing. =)
However, the zero-size vmcore problem is back on SN. But that is a dfiffernet problem.
Argh, more problems... / magnus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
|