On Friday 16 February 2007 20:12, Roman Zippel wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, 16 Feb 2007, Blaisorblade wrote: > > However, more important, if I remove STACKTRACE_SUPPORT, or if I make > > it 'default n', FAULT_INJECTION can still be enabled, even if it selects > > STACKTRACE which has a failed dependency (tested on UML). Which is a > > Kconfig bug - if A selects B and B depends on C, no dependency of A on C > > is deduced. Right Roman? > > Correct, but could someone please give me some more context, what the bug > is supposed to be here? Hmm. You agree that "if A selects B and B depends on C, no dependency of A on C is deduced", right? The implication is that the user can enable A, which selects B, while C is still disabled. The B -> C dependency is violated, and the build will fail or bad things will happen. I hope things are now clearer, even without the description of the testcase where this happened. -- Inform me of my mistakes, so I can add them to my list! Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade Chiacchiera con i tuoi amici in tempo reale! http://it.yahoo.com/mail_it/foot/*http://it.messenger.yahoo.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
|