Re: fault-injection framework on ia64

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



But if STACKTRACE depends on STACKTRACE_SUPPORT, which isn't defined on ia64,
kconfig should disable FAULT_INJECTION altogether with my patch (as it did
before it). I don't think that FAULT_INJECTION could be enabled before my
patch, right?

_BUT_ probably STACKTRACE_SUPPORT should be defined, with default n and no
prompt, on ia64, or Kconfig gets confused (it should output a warning,
like 'undefined symbol STACKTRACE_SUPPORT'). We on UML used to get warning
when INPUT was used but not defined. Hmmm....

Really? I intentionaly removed the STACKTRACE_SUPPORT in x86_64 Kconfig, then
I did make menuconfig. But I didn't get such warning.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Sparc Linux]     [DCCP]     [Linux ARM]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux x86_64]     [Linux for Ham Radio]

  Powered by Linux