On Wed, 17 Jan 2007, Andreas Schwab wrote: > Brent Casavant <bcasavan@xxxxxxx> writes: > > > Is there some particular reason we need the cast to int on the > > return path for atomic_cmpxchg()? It looks to me as if this > > macro would work equally well with an atomic_t or an atomic64_t. > > No, this is won't work, atomic_cmpxchg is strictly only defined for > atomic_t. See commit 4a6dae6d382e9edf3ff440b819e554ed706359bc. Use cmpxchg instead of atomic_cmpxchg. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
|