Re: [perfmon] 2.6.19 new perfmon code base + libpfm + pfmon
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: William Cohen <wcohen@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [perfmon] 2.6.19 new perfmon code base + libpfm + pfmon
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2006 22:28:10 +0000
- Cc: eranian@xxxxxxxxxx, perfmon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-ia64@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, oprofile-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, perfctr-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <4575AB54.2050509@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Mail-followup-to: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, William Cohen <wcohen@xxxxxxxxxx>, eranian@xxxxxxxxxx, perfmon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-ia64@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, oprofile-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, perfctr-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References: <20061204164644.GO31914@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4575AB54.2050509@xxxxxxxxxx>
- User-agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i
On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 12:24:36PM -0500, William Cohen wrote:
> Some of the ptrace functions (e.g. ptrace_may_attach in perfmon_syscall.c)
> being used in the perfmon kernel patches will go away with the utrace
> patches: http://people.redhat.com/roland/utrace/
At least for ptrace_may_attach that's not true in the lastest version
from Roland - in fact it's the last unconditional function in ptrace.c
in that version. I suggested to him to rename and move it in my review,
though.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[Index of Archives]
[Linux Kernel]
[Sparc Linux]
[DCCP]
[Linux ARM]
[Yosemite News]
[Linux SCSI]
[Linux x86_64]
[Linux for Ham Radio]