* Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, 14 Nov 2006 17:08:10 +0800 > "Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin_zhang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > I got an oops when booting 2.6.19-rc5-mm1 on my ia64 machine. > > > > Below is the log. > > > > Oops 11012296146944 [1] > > Modules linked in: binfmt_misc dm_mirror dm_multipath dm_mod thermal processor f > > an container button sg eepro100 e100 mii > > > > Pid: 0, CPU 0, comm: swapper > > psr : 0000121008022038 ifs : 800000000000040b ip : [<a0000001000e1411>] Not > > tainted > > ip is at __do_IRQ+0x371/0x3e0 > > unat: 0000000000000000 pfs : 000000000000040b rsc : 0000000000000003 > > rnat: 656960155aa56aa5 bsps: a00000010058b890 pr : 656960155aa55a65 > > ldrs: 0000000000000000 ccv : 0000000000000000 fpsr: 0009804c0270033f > > csd : 0000000000000000 ssd : 0000000000000000 > > b0 : a0000001000e1390 b6 : a0000001005beac0 b7 : e00000007f01aa00 > > f6 : 000000000000000000000 f7 : 0ffe69090000000000000 > > f8 : 1000a9090000000000000 f9 : 0ffff8000000000000000 > > f10 : 1000a908ffffff6f70000 f11 : 1003e0000000000000909 > > r1 : a000000100fbbff0 r2 : 0000000000010002 r3 : 0000000000010001 > > r8 : fffffffffffbffff r9 : a000000100bd8060 r10 : a000000100dd83b8 > > r11 : fffffffffffeffff r12 : a000000100bcbbb0 r13 : a000000100bc4000 > > r14 : 0000000000010000 r15 : 0000000000010000 r16 : a000000100c01aa8 > > r17 : a000000100d2c350 r18 : 0000000000000000 r19 : a000000100d2c300 > > r20 : a000000100c01a88 r21 : 0000000080010100 r22 : a000000100c01ac0 > > r23 : a0000001000108e0 r24 : e000000477980004 r25 : 0000000000000000 > > r26 : 0000000000000000 r27 : e00000000913400c r28 : e0000004799ee51c > > r29 : e0000004778b87f0 r30 : a000000100d2c300 r31 : a00000010005c7e0 > > > > Call Trace: > > [<a000000100014600>] show_stack+0x40/0xa0 > > sp=a000000100bcb760 bsp=a000000100bc4f40 > > [<a000000100014f00>] show_regs+0x840/0x880 > > sp=a000000100bcb930 bsp=a000000100bc4ee8 > > [<a000000100037fb0>] die+0x250/0x320 > > sp=a000000100bcb930 bsp=a000000100bc4ea0 > > [<a00000010005e5f0>] ia64_do_page_fault+0x8d0/0xa20 > > sp=a000000100bcb950 bsp=a000000100bc4e50 > > [<a00000010000caa0>] ia64_leave_kernel+0x0/0x290 > > sp=a000000100bcb9e0 bsp=a000000100bc4e50 > > [<a0000001000e1410>] __do_IRQ+0x370/0x3e0 > > sp=a000000100bcbbb0 bsp=a000000100bc4df0 > > [<a000000100011f50>] ia64_handle_irq+0x170/0x220 > > sp=a000000100bcbbb0 bsp=a000000100bc4dc0 > > [<a00000010000caa0>] ia64_leave_kernel+0x0/0x290 > > sp=a000000100bcbbb0 bsp=a000000100bc4dc0 > > [<a000000100012390>] ia64_pal_call_static+0x90/0xc0 > > sp=a000000100bcbd80 bsp=a000000100bc4d78 > > [<a000000100015630>] default_idle+0x90/0x160 > > sp=a000000100bcbd80 bsp=a000000100bc4d58 > > [<a000000100014290>] cpu_idle+0x1f0/0x440 > > sp=a000000100bcbe20 bsp=a000000100bc4d18 > > [<a000000100009980>] rest_init+0xc0/0xe0 > > sp=a000000100bcbe20 bsp=a000000100bc4d00 > > [<a0000001009f8ea0>] start_kernel+0x6a0/0x6c0 > > sp=a000000100bcbe20 bsp=a000000100bc4ca0 > > [<a0000001000089f0>] __end_ivt_text+0x6d0/0x6f0 > > sp=a000000100bcbe30 bsp=a000000100bc4c00 > > <0>Kernel panic - not syncing: Aiee, killing interrupt handler! > > > > > > The root cause is that some irq_chip variables, especially ia64_msi_chip, > > initiate their memeber end to point to NULL. __do_IRQ doesn't check > > if irq_chip->end is null and just calls it after processing the interrupt. > > > > As irq_chip->end is called at many places, so I fix it by reinitiating > > irq_chip->end to dummy_irq_chip.end, e.g., a noop function. > > > > Below patch against 2.6.19-rc5-mm1 fixes it. > > > > Signed-off-by: Zhang Yanmin <yanmin.zhang@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > --- > > > > --- linux-2.6.19-rc5-mm1/kernel/irq/chip.c 2006-11-14 14:16:16.000000000 +0800 > > +++ linux-2.6.19-rc5-mm1_fix/kernel/irq/chip.c 2006-11-14 14:14:25.000000000 +0800 > > @@ -233,6 +233,8 @@ void irq_chip_set_defaults(struct irq_ch > > chip->shutdown = chip->disable; > > if (!chip->name) > > chip->name = chip->typename; > > + if (!chip->end) > > + chip->end = dummy_irq_chip.end; > > } > > > > The same bug should be hitting in mainline, shouldn't it? correct. this bug comes from a 'mixed' IRQ setup on ia64: half of it is still old-style, half of it (the MSI stuff) is new-style irqchip code. But the ia64 lowlevel code unconditionally calls __do_IRQ(), which is a bug. the genirq code has all the right helpers for such a mixed situation: so a better fix might be the one below: use generic_handle_irq() instead of unconditionally calling into __do_IRQ(). But i have not tested it - Yanmin, can you confirm this too fixes your bug? similarly, any architecture that makes use of the new generic MSI infrastructure should not be calling __do_IRQ() directly. (but i'm not aware of any other besides ia64 - i386 and x86_64 is now fully irq-chip converted.) Eric, do you agree? Ingo -----------------> From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> Subject: ia64: use generic_handle_irq() use generic_handle_irq() to handle mixed-type irq handling. Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> Index: linux/arch/ia64/kernel/irq.c =================================================================== --- linux.orig/arch/ia64/kernel/irq.c +++ linux/arch/ia64/kernel/irq.c @@ -197,7 +197,7 @@ void fixup_irqs(void) struct pt_regs *old_regs = set_irq_regs(NULL); vectors_in_migration[irq]=0; - __do_IRQ(irq); + generic_handle_irq(irq); set_irq_regs(old_regs); } } Index: linux/arch/ia64/kernel/irq_ia64.c =================================================================== --- linux.orig/arch/ia64/kernel/irq_ia64.c +++ linux/arch/ia64/kernel/irq_ia64.c @@ -186,7 +186,7 @@ ia64_handle_irq (ia64_vector vector, str ia64_setreg(_IA64_REG_CR_TPR, vector); ia64_srlz_d(); - __do_IRQ(local_vector_to_irq(vector)); + generic_handle_irq(local_vector_to_irq(vector)); /* * Disable interrupts and send EOI: - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
![]() |