Russ Anderson wrote:
+ /*
+ * Look through the cache checks for a valid target identifier
+ */
+ for (i = 0; i < peidx_cache_check_num(peidx); i++) {
+ smei = (sal_log_mod_error_info_t *)peidx_cache_check(peidx, i);
+ if (smei->valid.target_identifier && smei->target_identifier)
+ return smei->target_identifier;
+ }
This says there would be more than 1 cache_check in the sal log. I suppose it also means there would be more than 1 identifier. Are there any reason why you don't handle identifiers other than listed earliest? Thanks, H.Seto - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
|