On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 03:39:10PM -0500, Jack Steiner wrote: > For kexec, it is ESSENTIAL that all cpus except for the one doing > the kexec be returned to the SAL slave loop. If this is not done, our > chipset will misdirect IO interrupts on the newly exec'ed kernel. Could you do an IPI call to have CPU 0 do the kexec and have the CPU that sent the IPI fall into the SAL slave loop instead? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
|