Re: [patch] show_mem() printk levels

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 14 Sep 2006, Jes Sorensen wrote:

> 
> Actually it's far worse than that if I got the math right, it will
> print in the order of 2 * NR_CPUS * NR_NODES * nr_zones, which for a
> machine with 1024 cpus and 1024 nodes will result in 2 million lines
> plus a bit of other noise.
> 
> This is a problem on all architectures, not just ia64, so I have a
> patch to try and trim that down too, so it gets done right. But we may
> also want to consider dropping the call altogether for ia64 or maybe
> if the number of nodes is larger than a certain amount (but I don't
> like inconsistent behavior depending on the size of a system).

Please lets just drop the call for ia64. For systems with a few cpus 
(typical for Linux use) the diagnostics are very useful.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Sparc Linux]     [DCCP]     [Linux ARM]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux x86_64]     [Linux for Ham Radio]

  Powered by Linux