Re: [PATCH] IA64,sparc: local DoS with corrupted ELFs
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] IA64,sparc: local DoS with corrupted ELFs
- From: Jes Sorensen <jes@xxxxxxx>
- Date: 08 Sep 2006 05:12:21 -0400
- Cc: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@xxxxxx>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxx>, Kirill Korotaev <dev@xxxxxxxxxx>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Fernando Vazquez <fernando@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, tony.luck@xxxxxxxxx, linux-ia64@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, stable@xxxxxxxxxx, xemul@xxxxxxxxxx, devel@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <1157569579.29093.51.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <44FC193C.4080205@xxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0609061120430.27779@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20060906182733.GJ2558@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1157569579.29093.51.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- User-agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.4
>>>>> "Arjan" == Arjan van de Ven <arjan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
Arjan> On Wed, 2006-09-06 at 12:27 -0600, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 06, 2006 at 11:24:05AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: >
>> If MIPS and parisc don't matter for the stable tree (very possible
>> - there > are no big commercial distributions for them), then
>> dammit, neither should > ia64 and sparc (there are no big
>> commercial distros for them either).
>>
>> Erm, RHEL and SLES both support ia64.
Arjan> but neither use -stable.
And getting a patch into -stable tends to be a really good argument
for a backport into the next vendor kernel :)
Cheers,
Jes
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[Index of Archives]
[Linux Kernel]
[Sparc Linux]
[DCCP]
[Linux ARM]
[Yosemite News]
[Linux SCSI]
[Linux x86_64]
[Linux for Ham Radio]