Re: [stable] [PATCH] IA64,sparc: local DoS with corrupted ELFs
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@xxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [stable] [PATCH] IA64,sparc: local DoS with corrupted ELFs
- From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 11:45:09 -0700
- Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxx>, Kirill Korotaev <dev@xxxxxxxxxx>, tony.luck@xxxxxxxxx, linux-ia64@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Fernando Vazquez <fernando@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, stable@xxxxxxxxxx, "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, devel@xxxxxxxxxx, xemul@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <20060906182733.GJ2558@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <44FC193C.4080205@xxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0609061120430.27779@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20060906182733.GJ2558@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- User-agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11)
On Wed, Sep 06, 2006 at 12:27:33PM -0600, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 06, 2006 at 11:24:05AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > If MIPS and parisc don't matter for the stable tree (very possible - there
> > are no big commercial distributions for them), then dammit, neither should
> > ia64 and sparc (there are no big commercial distros for them either).
>
> Erm, RHEL and SLES both support ia64.
Yes, but the -stable developers don't build for those arches, that's why
it was missed here.
So, what's the proper patch for the next -stable release to fix this
problem? I see a bunch of different ones floating around...
thanks,
greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[Index of Archives]
[Linux Kernel]
[Sparc Linux]
[DCCP]
[Linux ARM]
[Yosemite News]
[Linux SCSI]
[Linux x86_64]
[Linux for Ham Radio]
