Re: Move perfmon tables from thread_struct to pfm_context

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 08:55:28PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 11:08:56AM -0700, Keshavamurthy Anil S wrote:
> > This patch renders thread_struct->pmcs[] and thread_struct->pmds[]
> > OBSOLETE. The actual table is moved to pfm_context structure which 
> > is the right thing to do. Also this will in future avoid KABI breakages
> > for the distro as well when the table size changes.
> 
> NACK.  There is no such thing as a KABI, and any patch the claims to
> help towards it will automatically be rejected.  You should get a doctor
> to help you stop seeing things like that.
You have not fully understood the benifit of this patch. Moving pmds[] and pmcs[]
away from thread_struct saves that much space from the thread_struct
and in turns saves that much spaces from the task_struct. Again by moving
this table to pfm_context makes it possible that this table space is 
created only when pfm_context_alloc() is called which is 
when this is really required. This patch in fact reduces the sizeof task_struct
and their by allowing that extra space for the kernel stacks use :)

Please relook at the benifits of this patch again.

-Anil
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Sparc Linux]     [DCCP]     [Linux ARM]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux x86_64]     [Linux for Ham Radio]

  Powered by Linux