On Sun, 9 Jul 2006 20:38:40 -0600 Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@xxxxxx> wrote: > Yes. Here's the relevant part of the call tree: > > setup_arch > acpi_numa_init > acpi_numa_arch_fixup > acpi_online_node_fixup (test available_cpus) > ... > acpi_boot_init > acpi_table_parse_madt(..., acpi_parse_lsapic, ...) > acpi_parse_lsapic (increment available_cpus) > > Note that we test available_cpus in acpi_online_node_fixup() > before we increment it in acpi_parse_lsapic(), so the inner > loop is never executed. Hmm...okay, I misunderstood the boot path.. To work with my remove-empty-node patch, parsing lsapic should be done before SRAT. I'd like to fix this. BTW, can we move parsing MADT before SRAT ? -Kame - : send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
![]() |