On Thu, 2006-06-29 at 12:48 +0200, Jes Sorensen wrote: > Alan Cox wrote: > > Ar Iau, 2006-06-29 am 05:37 -0400, ysgrifennodd Jes Sorensen: > >> You have my vote for that one. Anything else is just going to cause > >> those broken userapps to continue doing the wrong thing. We should > >> really do this on all archs though. > > > > No need, all current mainstream architectures expose a constant user HZ. > Hi, > But you are still going to have the issue where someone installs their > own kernel and apps will break because of this? to answer that question with one word: no. read what Alan said: the HZ exposed to userspace is *constant*. For example, the i386 user visible HZ is 100, even if the kernel runs at a HZ of 250 or 1000.... Just when a HZ value gets exposed to userspace, it's transformed into a HZ=100 based value. And that's not a distribution thing, that's the kernel.org kernel honoring the stable-userspace-interface contract, and common sense.. Greetings, Arjan van de Ven - : send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
![]() |