Re: FOR REVIEW: New x86-64 vsyscall vgetcpu()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Andi Kleen wrote:

That is not how user space TLS works. It usually has a base a register.

Can you please give me a real life (simplified) example?

This means it cannot be cache colored (because you would need a static
offset) and you couldn't share task_structs on a page.

I do not see the problem. Can you explain please?
E.g. the scheduler pulls a task instead of the current one. The CPU
will see "current->thread_info.cpu"-s of all the tasks at the same
offset anyway.

Also you would make task_struct part of the userland ABI which
seems like a very very bad idea to me. It means we couldn't change
it anymore.

We can make some wrapper, e.g.:

	user_per_cpu_var(name, offset)

"vgetcpu()" would also be added to the ABI which we couldn't change
easily either.

Thanks,

Zoltan
-
: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Sparc Linux]     [DCCP]     [Linux ARM]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux x86_64]     [Linux for Ham Radio]

  Powered by Linux