Andi Kleen wrote:
That is not how user space TLS works. It usually has a base a register.
Can you please give me a real life (simplified) example?
This means it cannot be cache colored (because you would need a static offset) and you couldn't share task_structs on a page.
I do not see the problem. Can you explain please? E.g. the scheduler pulls a task instead of the current one. The CPU will see "current->thread_info.cpu"-s of all the tasks at the same offset anyway.
Also you would make task_struct part of the userland ABI which seems like a very very bad idea to me. It means we couldn't change it anymore.
We can make some wrapper, e.g.: user_per_cpu_var(name, offset) "vgetcpu()" would also be added to the ABI which we couldn't change easily either. Thanks, Zoltan - : send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
![]() |