Re: light weight counters: race free through local_t?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Zoltan Menyhart <Zoltan.Menyhart@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: light weight counters: race free through local_t?
From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2006 08:56:42 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: akpm@xxxxxxxx, ak@xxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-ia64@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <44915110.2050100@xxxxxxxx>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0606092212200.4875@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <449033B0.1020206@xxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0606140928500.4030@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <44915110.2050100@xxxxxxxx>

On Thu, 15 Jun 2006, Zoltan Menyhart wrote:

> My conclusion: let's stick to atomic counters.

Good to know. But we would run into trouble if the atomic counters would 
be contended.


-
: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Follow-Ups:
- Re: light weight counters: race free through local_t?
  - From: Zoltan Menyhart

References:
- light weight counters: race free through local_t?
  - From: Christoph Lameter
- Re: light weight counters: race free through local_t?
  - From: Zoltan Menyhart
- Re: light weight counters: race free through local_t?
  - From: Christoph Lameter
- Re: light weight counters: race free through local_t?
  - From: Zoltan Menyhart

Prev by Date: [RFC][PATCH]fix search_extable() to find correct entry
Next by Date: Re: light weight counters: race free through local_t?
Previous by thread: Re: light weight counters: race free through local_t?
Next by thread: Re: light weight counters: race free through local_t?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Kernel] [Sparc Linux] [DCCP] [Linux ARM] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCSI] [Linux x86_64] [Linux for Ham Radio]

Powered by Linux