On Wed, 3 May 2006, Hugh Dickins wrote: > Those architectures (including i386 and x86_64) which #define their > __pte_free_tlb etc. to tlb_remove_page are safe as is. But Zoltan's > ia64 #defines it to pte_free, which looks like it may free_page before > the TLB flush. But it is surprising if it has actually been unsafe Sorry but I am in .au right now with spotty high latency connectivity. But the people on linux-ia64 should know. Ken? Why was linux-ia64 not cced?? - : send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
|