Ian Wienand schrieb:
On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 10:07:35AM +0200, Christian Hildner wrote:Yes. So why not picking up Ken's idea of two parallel IVTs.I have a version of this, which I've tried to post here but I think the size limit here is very low. It made it through to linux-mm http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-mm&m=114664224732618&w=2 or the patches are at http://www.gelato.unsw.edu.au/~ianw/lvhpt/patches/v2 It generates ivt.S using a little script. Any feedback on this approach welcome.
Ian,I suggested a solution without having any script at all instead working with something like ivt.h containing macros for all common code and ivt_svhpt.S and ivt_lvhpt.S in parallel for specific code. It just might be more readable than your approach and both ways would be treated equal by the make process. Technically they are the same.
Christian - : send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
|