Re: [PATCH 00/05] robust per_cpu allocation for modules
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/05] robust per_cpu allocation for modules
- From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 16:48:52 -0700 (PDT)
- Cc: Ravikiran G Thirumalai <kiran@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, LKML <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxx>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>, Martin Mares <mj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, bjornw@xxxxxxxx, schwidefsky@xxxxxxxxxx, benedict.gaster@xxxxxxxxxx, lethal@xxxxxxxxxxxx, Chris Zankel <chris@xxxxxxxxxx>, Marc Gauthier <marc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Joe Taylor <joe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, David Mosberger-Tang <davidm@xxxxxxxxxx>, rth@xxxxxxxxxxx, spyro@xxxxxxx, starvik@xxxxxxxx, tony.luck@xxxxxxxxx, linux-ia64@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, ralf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-mips@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, grundler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, parisc-linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linuxppc-dev@xxxxxxxxxx, paulus@xxxxxxxxx, linux390@xxxxxxxxxx, davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0604171936040.24264@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <1145049535.1336.128.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4440855A.7040203@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0604170953390.29732@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20060417220238.GD3945@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.58.0604171936040.24264@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On Mon, 17 Apr 2006, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> So now we can focus on a better solution.
Could you have a look at Kiran's work?
Maybe one result of your work could be that the existing indirection
for alloc_percpu could be avoided?
-
: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[Index of Archives]
[Linux Kernel]
[Sparc Linux]
[DCCP]
[Linux ARM]
[Yosemite News]
[Linux SCSI]
[Linux x86_64]
[Linux for Ham Radio]
