Re: [PATCH 00/05] robust per_cpu allocation for modules

[Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>]

On Sunday 16 April 2006 09:06, Nick Piggin wrote:

> I still don't understand what the justification is for slowing down
> this critical bit of infrastructure for something that is only a
> problem in the -rt patchset, and even then only a problem when tracing
> is enabled.

There are actually problems outside -rt. e.g. the Xen kernel was running
into a near overflow and as more and more code is using per cpu variables
others might too.

I'm confident the problem can be solved without adding more variables
though - e.g. in the way rusty proposed.

-Andi


-
: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html