David Woodhouse wrote:
On Tue, 2006-04-04 at 22:25 -0400, Paul Nasrat wrote:I assume for the weekly snapshots of rawhide that you'll be putting unique (eg date based) names on the isos so they can be readily identified, else you're going to run into trouble tracking issuesacross media sets.To be honest, I'm not convinced that weekly ISO builds are particularly useful -- we don't do that for rawhide on other architectures either. It's probably better just to encourage people to use rsync to keep up with rawhide, rather than downloading it all over again each week.
Unfortunately, it seems I have users who are unwilling to use yum, etc., in the short term. They would prefer weekly snapshots.
Do these isos correspond with FC5 or a random snapshot?Rawhide for about a week leading up to March 20th was identical to FC5in all but the 'fedora-release' package.
Yep -- I replaced fedora-release with the FC5 version in the images. I didn't mention it because I didn't think it was that important :).
Aside from the updates, the next task is building Extras and Livna for IA64, of course...
Whaddya think I'm working on? :) P. - : send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
![]() |