Chen, Kenneth W wrote:
> Russ Anderson wrote on Wednesday, March 29, 2006 9:23 AM
> > Chen, Kenneth W wrote:
> > >
> > > Russ, do you reference __mca_table at run time? It looks like so. It's
> > > problematic that __mca_table is in __init section. Though I doubt that
> > > was the reason Jes ran into.
> >
> > It was right next to __ex_table in the original patch.
> > Yes, it is referenced at run time and should not be in
> > the __init section.
>
> I guess it's a merge error then :-P
This patch moves __mca_table out of the __init section.
Jes, can you give this a try?
-----------------------------------------------------
arch/ia64/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S | 18 +++++++++---------
1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6-linus/arch/ia64/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6-linus.orig/arch/ia64/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S 2006-03-28 09:03:23.000000000 -0600
+++ linux-2.6-linus/arch/ia64/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S 2006-03-29 11:24:56.943922578 -0600
@@ -70,6 +70,15 @@ SECTIONS
__stop___ex_table = .;
}
+ /* MCA table */
+ . = ALIGN(16);
+ __mca_table : AT(ADDR(__mca_table) - LOAD_OFFSET)
+ {
+ __start___mca_table = .;
+ *(__mca_table)
+ __stop___mca_table = .;
+ }
+
/* Global data */
_data = .;
@@ -128,15 +137,6 @@ SECTIONS
*(.initcall6.init)
*(.initcall7.init)
__initcall_end = .;
- }
-
- /* MCA table */
- . = ALIGN(16);
- __mca_table : AT(ADDR(__mca_table) - LOAD_OFFSET)
- {
- __start___mca_table = .;
- *(__mca_table)
- __stop___mca_table = .;
}
.data.patch.vtop : AT(ADDR(.data.patch.vtop) - LOAD_OFFSET)
-
: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
|