On Thu, Mar 16, 2006 at 01:41:55PM -0600, Mark Maule wrote: > On Thu, Mar 16, 2006 at 02:32:52PM -0500, Jun'ichi Nomura wrote: > > Hi Mark, > > > > Thanks for the reply. > > > > Mark Maule wrote: > > >>There is another problem that CONFIG_IA64_GENERIC still doesn't > > >>build due to error in SGI SN specific code. > > >>It needs additional fix. > > > > > >Ok, looking back at some of my original patches, it seems like the > > >declaration of msi_ops got moved from pci.h to and some forward > > >declarations > > >in ia64/msi.h were removed. This patch corrects the build problems. > > > > But, > > > > Greg said: > > >these are core pci things that no one else should care about. > > > > Andrew said: > > >a declaration for msi_register(), in drivers/pci/pci.h. > > > We don't want to add a duplicated declaration like this. > > > > I think the idea already gets objections. > > > > >The reason for putting struct msi_ops in pci.h is so that msi code that > > >resides outside of drivers/pci can use the declaration without having to > > >reach down into drivers/pci. > > > > The code in arch/ia64/sn/pci/msi.c looks much like > > drivers/pci/msi-apic.c. > > Why don't you move them to drivers/pci/msi-sgi-sn.c or something? > > I didn't do that originally 'cause I didn't think drivers/pci was the place > for platform-specific code. > > That said, I am not against moving sn/pci/msi.c into drivers if that is > more acceptable than putting msi_ops into pci.h. As msi.c today is pretty platform-specific as is, I don't have a problem with moving the ia64 stuff also into that directory. Especially as it will help solve issues like this a lot better. thanks, greg k-h - : send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
![]() |