On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 10:35:19AM -0700, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Monday 06 March 2006 09:32, Dean Roe wrote:
> > - for_each_node(cnode) {
> > + /*
> > + * FIXME: replace with cleaner for_each_XXX macro which addresses
> > + * both compute and IO nodes once ACPI3.0 is available.
> > + */
> > + for (cnode = 0; cnode < num_cnodes; cnode++) {
>
> I don't understand this ACPI 3.0 dependency. Can't you just define
> for_each_XXX() the way you want it, and fill in the bitmask or whatever
> it uses either (a) using ACPI 3.0 data, or (b) some interim hack?
>
> Bjorn
I can't really tell from your response, so...did you see Jack's explanation
of this?
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-ia64&m=114141537904761&w=2
Are you saying you *really* want a for_each_sn_cnode() macro? I guess
we can go that route if necessary...I just prefer the one-line change
rather than changing 4-5 files when we aren't really sure yet what the
final implementation will look like. I just want to make sure I am reading
you correctly.
Thanks,
Dean
--
Dean Roe
Silicon Graphics, Inc.
roe@xxxxxxx
-
: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
|