Re: gas is overly conservative with itc instruction

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: "Chen, Kenneth W" <kenneth.w.chen@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: gas is overly conservative with itc instruction
From: "John S. Worley" <jsworley@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2006 12:28:39 -0700
Cc: linux-ia64@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <B05667366EE6204181EABE9C1B1C0EB506C07A07@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <B05667366EE6204181EABE9C1B1C0EB506C07A07@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040804 Netscape/7.2 (ax)

Ken -

    Have you tried explicit bundling? I wouldn't rely on
the assembler to bundle critical code like this, and the
performance is worth the extra effort.

	Regards,
	John Worley
	jsworley@xxxxxxxxx

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Follow-Ups:
- RE: gas is overly conservative with itc instruction
  - From: Chen, Kenneth W

References:
- gas is overly conservative with itc instruction
  - From: Chen, Kenneth W

Prev by Date: gas is overly conservative with itc instruction
Next by Date: RE: gas is overly conservative with itc instruction
Previous by thread: gas is overly conservative with itc instruction
Next by thread: RE: gas is overly conservative with itc instruction
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Kernel] [Sparc Linux] [DCCP] [Linux ARM] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCSI] [Linux x86_64] [Linux for Ham Radio]

Powered by Linux