On Tue, Mar 04, 2025 at 07:46:09PM +0800, Inochi Amaoto wrote: > On Tue, Mar 04, 2025 at 01:43:27PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 04, 2025 at 03:02:11PM +0800, Inochi Amaoto wrote: > > > Add ACPI ID for DWAPB I2C controller on Sophgo SG2044 so > > > the SoC can enumerated the device via ACPI. > > > > Same as per UART: > > > > ---8<--- > > > > This is fake ACPI ID. Please work with a vendor to issue the proper one. > > Vendor ACPI ID registry has no records on Sophgo: > > https://uefi.org/ACPI_ID_List?acpi_search=SophGo > > > > NAK. > > > > ---8<--- > > > > But, it might be that is already in the process of getting proper ACPI vendor > > ID, please provide an evidence in such a case. > > > > Otherwise drag the representative of the vendor to this email thread to answer > > the question why the heck they abuse ACPI specification. > > OK, I will ask for the vendor and check whether there is some > evidence for it. Now let's pause these patch. > > Thanks for your info. You're welcome! As I already replied in another mail, feel free to contact me or give my contacts to the vendor in order to help them to follow the process. I will be glad to help. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
