Re: [PATCH 3/3] i2c: qup: Vote for interconnect bandwidth to DRAM

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Krzysztof,

On Wed, Feb 19, 2025 at 08:00:25AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 19/02/2025 00:02, Andi Shyti wrote:
> > sorry for the very late reply here. Just one question.
> > 
> > ...
> > 
> >> downstream/vendor driver [1]. Due to lack of documentation about the
> >> interconnect setup/behavior I cannot say exactly if this is right.
> >> Unfortunately, this is not implemented very consistently downstream...
> > 
> > Can we have someone from Qualcomm or Linaro taking a peak here?
> 
> You replied to some old email, not in my inbox anymore,

feeling nostalgic :-)

> but your quote
> lacks standard quote-template, like:
> 
> 	On 19/02/2025 00:02, Andi Shyti wrote:

I'm strictly following RFC-1855, but you're right I removed a bit
too much to lose time reference.

> so I really don't know when was it sent. For sure more than a month ago,
> maybe more? This has to be resent if you want anything done here.

It was sent on "Tue, 28 Nov 2023 10:48:34 +0100", definitely more
than a month ago, I'm also surprised to have it in my inbox. But
it still applies cleanly.

Perhaps a resend can invite people for more reviews. I don't
mind.

Thanks,
Andi




[Index of Archives]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Hardward Monitoring]     [LM Sensors]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux