Hi Zoie,
my comment was on the [PATCH v3 ...], this should have been
[PATCH v4 1/1]. If you use git-format-patch, most probably you
will get it right.
If you have more than one patch, you can use the --cover-letter.
option to get the patch 0/X.
On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 10:39:37PM +0800, Zoie Lin wrote:
> Introduce support for runtime PM operations in
> the I2C driver, enabling runtime suspend and resume functionality.
>
> Although in most platforms, the bus power of i2c is always
> on, some platforms disable the i2c bus power in order to meet
> low power request.
>
> This implementation includes bus regulator control to facilitate
> proper handling of the bus power based on platform requirements.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zoie Lin <zoie.lin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Is it possible to have an ack from Qii?
> ---
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mt65xx.c | 73 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 61 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> This series is based on linux-next, tag: next-20250210
>
> Changes in v4:
what about the previous versions?
> - Removed unnecessary variable initialization.
> - Removed unnecessary brackets.
> - Corrected grammar issues in the commit message.
> - Confirmed autosuspend delay is not necessary.
>
...
> @@ -1472,13 +1507,18 @@ static int mtk_i2c_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> }
> }
>
> - ret = clk_bulk_prepare_enable(I2C_MT65XX_CLK_MAX, i2c->clocks);
> + ret = clk_bulk_prepare(I2C_MT65XX_CLK_MAX, i2c->clocks);
> if (ret) {
> - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "clock enable failed!\n");
Why have you removed this dev_err? You coulde have rather changed
it to match the error. While at it you could also replace it with
dev_err_probe()
The rest looks good to me, I'll be happy if you can have an ack
from Qii.
Andi
> return ret;
