On 06.02.2025 17:59, Wolfram Sang wrote: > Hi Heiner, > >> With RFC fix (v2) sent, the issue should be solved. >> Would be good to have your feedback on the fix approach. > > I had a glimpse, and the patch was too intrusive for a quick fix with > changing the locking everywhere. So, I will still revert the original > changes to buy us more time. In addition, as we overlooked one code > path, we should double check that we didn't overlook another one in that > regard, i.e. muxes. We should develop better test cases, too. > Understood. How to go on from here? Bring the two patches plus v2 of the fix to linux-next for 6.15? I only have consumer hw w/o i2c muxes, therefore can just compile-test the mux part. > Happy hacking, > > Wolfram > Heiner
