Hi Zoie, On Fri, Jan 03, 2025 at 10:32:33PM +0800, Zoie Lin wrote: > This series is based on linux-next, tag: next-20241220 > > Changes in v3: > > This patch removes the autosuspend functionality from the runtime > PM operations in the I2C driver. These changes have been tested on > the target platform and confirmed to work correctly without the > autosuspend functionality. Was the autosuspend delay not necessary, then? Is there a specific reason you included it in the first place? BTW, next time, please use the format [PATCH v3 0/1] for patches. Also, for just one patch, a cover letter isn't really necessary. You can include the changelog after the '---' section of the patch. was, then, the autosuspend delay not necessary? Andi > Additionally, the patch resumes the I2C bus in mtk_i2c_resume_noirq() > to fix the unbalanced disable issue. > > > Zoie Lin (1): > i2c: mediatek: add runtime PM operations and bus regulator control > > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mt65xx.c | 75 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------ > 1 file changed, 63 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) > > -- > 2.45.2 >
