From: Stefan Eichenberger <stefan.eichenberger@xxxxxxxxxxx>
A regression was introduced with the implementation of single-master
mode, preventing proper stop conditions from being generated. Devices
that require a valid stop condition, such as EEPROMs, fail to function
correctly as a result.
The issue only affects devices with the single-master property enabled.
This commit resolves the issue by re-enabling I2C bus busy bit (IBB)
polling for single-master mode when generating a stop condition. The fix
further ensures that the i2c_imx->stopped flag is cleared at the start
of each transfer, allowing the stop condition to be correctly generated
in i2c_imx_stop().
According to the reference manual (IMX8MMRM, Rev. 2, 09/2019, page
5270), polling the IBB bit to determine if the bus is free is only
necessary in multi-master mode. Consequently, the IBB bit is not polled
for the start condition in single-master mode.
Fixes: 6692694aca86 ("i2c: imx: do not poll for bus busy in single master mode")
Signed-off-by: Stefan Eichenberger <stefan.eichenberger@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx.c | 8 +++-----
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx.c
index f751d231ded8..cbf66a69e20b 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx.c
@@ -534,20 +534,18 @@ static int i2c_imx_bus_busy(struct imx_i2c_struct *i2c_imx, int for_busy, bool a
{
unsigned long orig_jiffies = jiffies;
unsigned int temp;
-
- if (!i2c_imx->multi_master)
- return 0;
+ bool multi_master = i2c_imx->multi_master;
while (1) {
temp = imx_i2c_read_reg(i2c_imx, IMX_I2C_I2SR);
/* check for arbitration lost */
- if (temp & I2SR_IAL) {
+ if (multi_master && (temp & I2SR_IAL)) {
i2c_imx_clear_irq(i2c_imx, I2SR_IAL);
return -EAGAIN;
}
- if (for_busy && (temp & I2SR_IBB)) {
+ if (for_busy && (!multi_master || (temp & I2SR_IBB))) {
i2c_imx->stopped = 0;
break;
}
--
2.45.2
