On Wed, Dec 11, 2024 at 04:46:45PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Wed, Dec 11, 2024 at 4:43 PM Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > It's a pity that all this description is lost. I love long > > > > explanations especially when they come from test results. > > > > > > > > Can I add it in the commit log? > > > > > > What about starting to add Link: tags pointing to lore to I2C commits, > > > like most other subsystems do? > > > That way people can easily reach any background information (if > > > available), and find the corresponding email thread where to report > > > issues or follow-up information? > > > > To be honest, I'm not a big fan of putting links in commit logs > > (not even 'Closes:') and was happy not to see any here. If the > > domain changes for some reason (which always happens sooner or > > later), we'd just end up with a bunch of broken links in our > > commits. > > > > If others want to have the Link added I can definitely add them. > > In general, we assume kernel.org will survive... > > > > [1] https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.12.4/source/Documentation/maintainer/configure-git.rst#L33 > > > > b4 can add the link, as well. > > > > If you prefer, then, I will take this patch as it is. > > Please do so; thanks! merged to i2c/i2c-host-fixes with the Link: tag. Thanks, Andi
