On Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 05:53:39PM +0800, Jiapeng Chong wrote: > Variable cci_clk_rate is not effectively used, so delete it. > > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qcom-cci.c:526:16: warning: variable ‘cci_clk_rate’ set but not used. > > Reported-by: Abaci Robot <abaci@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Closes: https://bugzilla.openanolis.cn/show_bug.cgi?id=11532 > Fixes: 823dfb7bdb21 ("i2c: qcom-cci: Stop complaining about DT set clock rate") > Signed-off-by: Jiapeng Chong <jiapeng.chong@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > Changes in v3: > -Modify the commit message. Modify how? What was the reason for ignoring the R-B tag? > > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qcom-cci.c | 9 --------- > 1 file changed, 9 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qcom-cci.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qcom-cci.c > index 5cc791b3b57d..a0ef43e99751 100644 > --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qcom-cci.c > +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qcom-cci.c > @@ -523,7 +523,6 @@ static const struct dev_pm_ops qcom_cci_pm = { > static int cci_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > { > struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; > - unsigned long cci_clk_rate = 0; > struct device_node *child; > struct resource *r; > struct cci *cci; > @@ -594,14 +593,6 @@ static int cci_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > return dev_err_probe(dev, -EINVAL, "not enough clocks in DT\n"); > cci->nclocks = ret; > > - /* Retrieve CCI clock rate */ > - for (i = 0; i < cci->nclocks; i++) { > - if (!strcmp(cci->clocks[i].id, "cci")) { > - cci_clk_rate = clk_get_rate(cci->clocks[i].clk); > - break; > - } > - } > - > ret = cci_enable_clocks(cci); > if (ret < 0) > return ret; > -- > 2.32.0.3.g01195cf9f > -- With best wishes Dmitry
