On 27.09.2024 11:24 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On Fri, Sep 27, 2024 at 12:01:05PM +0530, Mukesh Kumar Savaliya wrote: >> Adds qcom,shared-se flag usage. Use this when particular I2C serial >> controller needs to be shared between two subsystems. >> >> SE = Serial Engine, meant for I2C controller here. >> TRE = Transfer Ring Element, refers to Queued Descriptor. >> SS = Subsystems (APPS processor, Modem, TZ, ADSP etc). >> >> Example : >> Two clients from different SS can share an I2C SE for same slave device >> OR their owned slave devices. >> Assume I2C Slave EEPROM device connected with I2C controller. >> Each client from ADSP SS and APPS Linux SS can perform i2c transactions. >> This gets serialized by lock TRE + DMA Transfers + Unlock TRE at HW level. >> >> Signed-off-by: Mukesh Kumar Savaliya <quic_msavaliy@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/qcom,i2c-geni-qcom.yaml | 4 ++++ >> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/qcom,i2c-geni-qcom.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/qcom,i2c-geni-qcom.yaml >> index 9f66a3bb1f80..3b9b20a0edff 100644 >> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/qcom,i2c-geni-qcom.yaml >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/qcom,i2c-geni-qcom.yaml >> @@ -60,6 +60,10 @@ properties: >> power-domains: >> maxItems: 1 >> >> + qcom,shared-se: >> + description: True if I2C needs to be shared between two or more subsystems(SS). > > The "SS" and subsystem should be explained in the binding. Please do not > use some qcom-specific abbreviations here, but explain exactly, e.g. > processors like application processor and DSP. > > "se" is also not explained in the binding - please open it and look for > such explanation. > > This all should be rephrased to make it clear... We talked about this > and I do not see much of improvements except commit msg, so we are > making circles. I don't know, get someone internally to help you in > upstreaming this. > > Is sharing of IP blocks going to be also for other devices? If yes, then > this should be one property for all Qualcomm devices. If not, then be > sure that this is the case because I will bring it up if you come with > one more solution for something else. As far as I understand, everything that's not protocol-specific (in this case it would be I2C tunables etc.) is common across all protocols supported by the serial engine. Konrad