Re: [PULL REQUEST] i2c-for-6.12-rc1

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Linus,

...

> > The Intel LJCA driver loses "target_addr" parameter in
> > ljca_i2c_stop() because it was unused.
> [..]
> > Still in the iMX/MXC driver a comma ',' has been replaced by a
> > semicolon ';', while in different drivers the ',' has been
> > removed from the '{ }' delimiters.
> 
> Stop describing pointless noise. The pull request - and the resulting
> merge message - is about USEFUL INFORMATION.
> 
> The above is just pure noise. You're literally hiding all the useful
> stuff by overwhelming people with totally uninteresting stuff that
> matters not at all.
> 
> I edited things down a bit, but I shouldn't need to wade through this
> kind of pointless verbiage.
> 
> I want a useful *summary* of what has happened, and what I'm getting.
> Not some line-by-line "I changed a character".
> 
> Is this some broken attempt at AI summary? Because it sure isn't real
> intelligence.

No, it's not AI summary, of course. I tried to be as more
specific as I could in the description.

I'll keep your message in mind for the next time and compare the
way you reworded the git description with my version.

Thanks,
Andi




[Index of Archives]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Hardward Monitoring]     [LM Sensors]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux