On Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 09:59:31AM +0800, Tyrone Ting wrote: > Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 於 2024年9月20日 週五 下午10:33寫道: > > On Fri, Sep 20, 2024 at 06:18:18PM +0800, warp5tw@xxxxxxxxx wrote: ... > > > Store the client address earlier since it might get called in > > > the i2c_recover_bus logic flow at the early stage of the func() > > > npcm_i2c_master_xfer. > > > > You got my comment really wrong. > > > > func() in my example was to refer to _a_ function mentioned in the text. > > And IIRC I even posted the example, like: i2c_recover_bus(). > > So the commit message in next patch set would be like: Yes. > Store the client address earlier since it might get called in > the i2c_recover_bus() logic flow at the early stage of > npcm_i2c_master_xfer(). > > The code comment would be like: Yes! > Previously, the address was stored w/o left-shift by one bit and > with that shift in the following call to npcm_i2c_master_start_xmit(). > > Since there are cases that the i2c_recover_bus() gets called at the > early stage of npcm_i2c_master_xfer(), the address is > stored with the shift and used in the i2c_recover_bus call(). -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko