On Mon, Sep 16, 2024 at 12:36 PM Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Sep 15, 2024 at 12:44:13PM +0200, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 13, 2024 at 12:25 PM Andy Shevchenko
> > <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > On Wed, Sep 11, 2024 at 03:27:44PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
>
> ...
>
> > > > +int i2c_of_probe_component(struct device *dev, const struct i2c_of_probe_cfg *cfg, void *ctx)
> > > > +{
> > > > + const struct i2c_of_probe_ops *ops;
> > > > + const char *type;
> > > > + struct device_node *i2c_node;
> > > > + struct i2c_adapter *i2c;
> > > > + int ret;
> > > > +
> > > > + if (!cfg)
> > > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > > +
> > > > + ops = cfg->ops ?: &i2c_of_probe_dummy_ops;
> > > > + type = cfg->type;
> > > > +
> > > > + i2c_node = i2c_of_probe_get_i2c_node(dev, type);
> > >
> > >
> > > struct device_node *i2c_node __free(of_node_put) =
> > > i2c_...;
> >
> > cleanup.h says to not mix the two styles (scoped vs goto). I was trying
> > to follow that, though I realize now that with the scoped loops it
> > probably doesn't help.
> >
> > I'll revert back to having __free().
> >
> > > > + if (IS_ERR(i2c_node))
> > > > + return PTR_ERR(i2c_node);
> > > > +
> > > > + for_each_child_of_node_with_prefix(i2c_node, node, type) {
> > > > + if (!of_device_is_available(node))
> > > > + continue;
> > > > +
> > > > + /*
> > > > + * Device tree has component already enabled. Either the
> > > > + * device tree isn't supported or we already probed once.
> > > > + */
> > > > + ret = 0;
> > >
> > > Shouldn't you drop reference count for "node"? (See also below)
> >
> > This for-each loop the "scoped". It just doesn't have the prefix anymore.
> > I believe you asked if the prefix could be dropped and then Rob agreed.
>
> Hmm... I have looked into the implementation and I haven't found the evidence
> that this is anyhow scoped. Can you point out what I have missed?
