Thu, Sep 12, 2024 at 09:29:38AM +0200, Andi Shyti kirjoitti: ... > > - sch_io_wr8(priv, SMBHSTSTS, temp); > > + sch_io_wr8(priv, SMBHSTSTS, temp & 0x0f); > > there is still a dev_dbg() using temp. To be on the safe side, do > we want to do a "temp &= 0x0f" after the read_poll_timeout? Isn't it even better that we have more information in the debug output? -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
