On 9/9/24 23:43, Jerome Brunet wrote:
On Mon 09 Sep 2024 at 11:16, Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 9/9/24 08:39, Jerome Brunet wrote:
Add support for POWER_GOOD_ON and POWER_GOOD_OFF standard PMBus commands.
For PMBus devices that offer a POWER_GOOD signal, these commands are used
for setting the output voltage at which a power good signal should be
asserted and negated.
Power Good signals are device and manufacturer specific. Many factors
other
than output voltage may be used to determine whether or not the POWER_GOOD
signal is to be asserted. PMBus device users are instructed to consult the
device manufacturer’s product literature for the specifics of the device
they are using.
Note that depending on the choice of the device manufacturer that a
device
may drive a POWER_GOOD signal high or low to indicate that the signal is
asserted.
Signed-off-by: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/hwmon/pmbus/pmbus.h | 3 +++
drivers/hwmon/pmbus/pmbus_core.c | 6 ++++++
2 files changed, 9 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/pmbus.h b/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/pmbus.h
index 5d5dc774187b..e322d2dd9fb7 100644
--- a/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/pmbus.h
+++ b/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/pmbus.h
@@ -78,6 +78,9 @@ enum pmbus_regs {
PMBUS_IIN_OC_FAULT_LIMIT = 0x5B,
PMBUS_IIN_OC_WARN_LIMIT = 0x5D,
+ PMBUS_POWER_GOOD_ON = 0x5E,
+ PMBUS_POWER_GOOD_OFF = 0x5F,
+
PMBUS_POUT_OP_FAULT_LIMIT = 0x68,
PMBUS_POUT_OP_WARN_LIMIT = 0x6A,
PMBUS_PIN_OP_WARN_LIMIT = 0x6B,
diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/pmbus_core.c b/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/pmbus_core.c
index 0ea6fe7eb17c..94ddf0166770 100644
--- a/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/pmbus_core.c
+++ b/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/pmbus_core.c
@@ -1768,6 +1768,12 @@ static const struct pmbus_limit_attr vout_limit_attrs[] = {
.attr = "crit",
.alarm = "crit_alarm",
.sbit = PB_VOLTAGE_OV_FAULT,
+ }, {
+ .reg = PMBUS_POWER_GOOD_ON,
+ .attr = "good_on",
+ }, {
+ .reg = PMBUS_POWER_GOOD_OFF,
+ .attr = "good_off",
}, {
.reg = PMBUS_VIRT_READ_VOUT_AVG,
.update = true,
Those attributes are not hardware monitoring attributes and therefore not
acceptable. In general I am not sure if they should be configurable in the
first place, but definitely not from the hardware monitoring subsystem.
Maybe the regulator subsystem callbacks set_over_voltage_protection and
set_under_voltage_protection would be appropriate (with severity
REGULATOR_SEVERITY_PROT), but that should be discussed with regulator
subsystem maintainers.
According to PMBUS spec, there is no protection associated with that
command. It just tells when the output voltage is considered good, when
it is not. What it does after that really depends the device, it may
drive a pin for example (or an LED indicator in my case).
It is much more likely that it connects to the reset signal on the board,
or it enables/disables power to parts of the board.
It is very similar to 'crit' or other limits in that sense,
I think. I don't really get why such property is not OK in hwmon then
and why it should not be configurable, if the other limits are ?
Its use is for hardware control, not monitoring, even if it may be connected
to a status LED. MAX15301, for example, groups the command under "Voltage
Sequencing Commands".
On top of that, the voltages are value/hysteresis values. The "off" voltage
is lower than the "on" voltage.
TPS25990 doesn't even support the command according to its datasheet, so I am
at loss about your use case in the context of this patch series (the PGOOD pin
on this chip signals to the downstream load that it is ok to draw power).
Guenter
