Hi Kimriver,
On Mon, Sep 09, 2024 at 02:26:30PM GMT, Liu Kimriver/刘金河 wrote:
>
> HI andi
>
> Due to a 12 time difference，I had been off work.
> I am very sorry that I can't reply email in time. I will reply to your email immediately after going to work tomorrow.
It's not a problem, take your time! :-)
> >> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-common.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-common.c
> >> @@ -453,6 +453,18 @@ void __i2c_dw_disable(struct dw_i2c_dev *dev)
> >>
> >> abort_needed = raw_intr_stats & DW_IC_INTR_MST_ON_HOLD;
> >> if (abort_needed) {
> >> + if (!(enable & DW_IC_ENABLE_ENABLE)) {
> >> + regmap_write(dev->map, DW_IC_ENABLE, DW_IC_ENABLE_ENABLE);
> >> + enable |= DW_IC_ENABLE_ENABLE;
> >> + /*
> >> + * Need two ic_clk delay when enabling the I2C to ensure ENABLE bit
> >> + * is already set. Wait 10 times the signaling period of the highest
> >> + * I2C transfer supported by the driver(for 400KHz this is 25us)
> >> + * as described in the DesignWare I2C databook.
> >> + */
> >> + usleep_range(25, 250);
>
> >I think there is a misunderstanding here. Andy asked you to use
> >flseep and improve the calculation: "Please, calculate this delay
> >based on the actual speed in use (or about to be in use)."[*]
>
> >Andy can you please clarify with Kimriver here?
>
> if we use 400kHz ,need setting flseep(25);
> if we use 100kHz ,need setting flseep(100);
> Overall, take the maximum value:flseep(100);
Thanks for clarifying, then this is what Andy asked to do,
instead of waiting an average random amount from 25 to 250us.
Does it make sense to you?
Thanks,
Andi
