On 29/08/2024 17:39, Nikunj Kela wrote: > > On 8/29/2024 12:36 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> On Wed, Aug 28, 2024 at 01:37:13PM -0700, Nikunj Kela wrote: >>> Add compatible for smmu representing support on SA8255p. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Nikunj Kela <quic_nkela@xxxxxxxxxxx> >>> --- >>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.yaml | 3 +++ >>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) >>> >> Your subjects contain quite redundant/excessive information. In the same >> time they lack information about device. >> >> 1. s/document the support on/add/ >> 2. s/SA8255p/SA8255p SMMU-or-whatever-device-it-is/ >> >> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> >> >> Best regards, >> Krzysztof > > Okay. I thought arm-smmu tag already indicate which device this patch is > for but would put SMMU explicitly in the subject. arm,smmu indicates the binding file which might be or might not exactly be the same as actual device. Sometimes they have difference names. I am not saying that it would be beneficial here, but some other patches could benefit probably. Best regards, Krzysztof
