On 19.08.2024 19:39, Conor Dooley wrote: > On Mon, Aug 19, 2024 at 01:22:39PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> On 19/08/2024 13:10, claudiu beznea wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 19.08.2024 14:05, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >>>> On Mon, Aug 19, 2024 at 01:23:44PM +0300, Claudiu wrote: >>>>> From: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea.uj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>>> >>>>> Document the Renesas RZ/G3S (R9A08G045) RIIC IP. This is compatible with >>>>> the version available on Renesas RZ/V2H (R9A09G075). >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea.uj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>>> --- >>>>> >>>>> Changes in v4: >>>>> - added comment near the fallback for RZ/G3S; because of this >>>>> dropped Conor's tag >>>> >>>> That's not a reason to request a re-review. > > FWIW, I don't care about how many binding patches I do or do not get > credit for reviewing. I had no intention to drop your credit for reviewing this. In the past I went though situations where reviewer complained due to keeping the tag and doing very simple adjustment on the next version. I dropped your tag to avoid that situation here too and mentioned it in the change log. Thank you, Claudiu Beznea > Feel free to give a tag yourself Krzysztof in the > future if you come across these situations and I'll happily hit ctrl+d > and remove the thread from my mailbox rather than reply :) > >>> >>> Sorry for that, I wasn't aware of the procedure for this on bindings. >> >> There is no difference. Please read carefully submitting patches, >> including the chapter about tags. > > Yeah, I don't think this patch is materially different on those > grounds... > > Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Cheers, > Conor.
